Friday, September 13, 2013

NONFICTION LITERATURE ANALYSIS #1


 
“Ishmael: An adventure of the Mind and Spirit”

Daniel Quinn

TOPICS/EVENTS

1)      My book was like nothing I’ve ever read before. Its existentialist view allowed me to open my mind more to comprehend these grand concepts about life in general and human nature. The protagonist, a young student in search of a teacher, finally comes across an ad on a newspaper by a teacher seeking a human who is interested in ‘saving the world’ as it stated. They come into contact with each other and he teaches him life-long important lessons about saving the planet, mankind and other species. He teaches that has ‘Taker’ humans we must learn to change our evil ways or perish with the rest. We are slowly destroying the world without realizing. He teaches that we are trapped in our own cultural prison and the sad thing is that most realize this without caring much about the facts but concentrate on achieving power in this prison to have more control over it than anyone else, rather than actually changing our horrible lifestyles. He teaches about the different ways to live and evolution; theory of how man came to be. He gives man hope and gives us exactly what we need to survive and thrive.

2)      My author chose to write about this specific topic for obvious reasons. The world or at least the world for MAN as we know it is quickly coming to an end. Why? It all comes down to our increasing human population and human interaction with other species. Over-population leads to over-production which becomes a never-ending cycle. We are the cause of our own problem. The way we have chosen to live for the past couple thousand years from the agricultural revolution and on, is the selfish way categorizing us as the ‘Takers’ in the world. We take what we want, what we need and what we think we need. In doing so, we are slowly supporting the extinction of various species in our environment. We have been doing this for years, killing off anything interfering with our evil ways and not minding the ‘Leavers’ of the planet and our precious innocent animals. The ‘Leaver’ would be categorized as the peaceful, mindful people who abide by the natural law of nature which is: take what you need and leave the rest alone. He wrote this book to alert us about our selfish ways, just in case it wasn’t obvious, and how it eventually WILL backfire and have a negative effect on only us, but it’s what we are asking for living the way we’ve been for generations and generations. It’s sort of like a reality check.

3)      Well, Eddie, Izamar and I walked into Mrs. Byrne’s classroom and said, “Mrs. Byrne, we need thin books.” So she appointed us to her small in-class library and showed us multiple books giving us insight on each but we mostly just cared about the length. Then she grabbed a book in the quickness and said, “Oh, Ishmael! This is a really good book!” We looked through the pages and realized it was sort of long and we all called skips. Then she mentioned it was an existentialist book and I re-considered. The bell rang and by this time Eddie and Izamar had found their books and feeling defeated I grabbed Ishmael. Then I told myself to stop being lazy and read this book because it was a topic within my interest and I knew I would not regret it, so I did. The minute I opened it and read the first Chapter I knew I could not go wrong. This was my type of book! The thing about this book that made me want to continue reading was the fact that it tackled such incomprehensible aspects of life that many refuse to explore. I could EASILY relate to this because many of these questions I have asked myself for years and they were answered in this book. I finished the book yesterday and I am extremely proud of having made this decision. Thank you Mrs. Byrne, I shall return to you for more of your amazing books.

4)      Yes, definitely. The book’s ideas and themes were realistic. The realest of the realest. It was all there just waiting for someone to piece it all together, and that’s exactly what Daniel Quinn did. I made connections with history and human interactions with the world and with humans themselves. After reading this book, everything just makes sense now. How he explains human nature and how we think and react, it was truly astonishing.   

PEOPLE

1)      The author chose the average young human being confused about the world and extremely curious and caring for the most part attempting to solve an issue we’ve had at hand for so long without anyone clearly doing anything about it. The fact that I could replace the main character with myself was all I needed to understand the complexity of this book. A real person with the same thoughts as I and reacting how I would react. The tone is irritated and angry, not with any single person specifically, but with the struggles of life in general and the nature of these ideas and how ignorant we have been since we came into existence has homo sapiens. These choices prove that the author wants us to relate to the protagonist and place us in the inquiry stage as in: What will we do next?

2)      The protagonist, I never quite got a hold of his name however it is irrelevant, was a determined man in search of answers about life and how exactly is the correct way to live it. He never gave up in his search and did not quit until he found exactly what he was looking for. The entire book was a conversation between him and his teacher Ishmael. The book doesn’t give much physical description of the character but mainly sticks to their actual personalities because that is what actually matters in the book. As fictional characters, I would describe them through both direct and indirect characterization. I would stick to indirect characterization as the author did due to the fact that it is important to be able to make assumptions about characters because in real life that is exactly what we do therefore it can be found in literature as well.

3)      The fact that they have such open minds about realities and increased knowledge-based judgments makes them interesting enough to write about. They are sort of like interpreters to the things we already know and things we are still trying to figure out as a society and distinguishing the difference between what is right and wrong.

STYLE  

1)      Yes, he utilized foreshadowing when the teacher was taken away to a town a couple miles North because this enabled the reader to infer that the relationship between Ishmael, the teacher and the protagonist was slowly beginning to fade and would possibly come to an end by uncontrollable life factors. He still managed to utilize this journalistic style throughout the entire novel mainly because the entire thing was a collection of thoughts and connections about the world.

2)      The author definitely utilizes lengthy descriptions about ideas and mise en abymes, a French term referring to a story within a story but the same principle does not apply to people. He focuses mainly on dialogue between the same two people the whole book. These have positive effects on the book in the way that if the author spent more time giving us lengthy descriptions on the places and more people we encountered, it would simply be a waste of time and completely irrelevant to the facts and the point of the book.

3)      To create tone and mood, the author heavily portrays emotions. He makes it very clear when a character is in pain, confusion and especially anger. These emotions are important because we need them in order to evaluate ourselves as humans and exactly how we react to real life situations.

4)      I think the author’s attitude toward the subject was obviously very strong in the sense that he felt the need to educate a population through a well-structured novel. His attitude toward the characters is just a self-evaluation of ourselves to prove a point. His attitude toward the audience would be much more sort of angered but still patient. His overall attitude is positive filled with hope for humanity even if the reader does not believe so himself. His great task of teaching us something so important for our nature tells us everything about his attitude regardless of any misinterpretations by any mistaken readers.

5)      The author offers countless references. The novel includes everything from religious to science aspects of his views. He mentions passages from the Holy Bible, theories of Evolution, parables, laws, interpersonal connections, people to people interactions, and ethnic/cultural/religious history accounts. Within these, they vary from a range of long periods of time and some dating back to B.C. as well as A.D. of course. Yes, it matter MAJORLY because it proves that he took REAL information to give us knowledge on our inner selves and our ancestors that we may have never paid attention to. Without these multiple references and facts, this book would be meaningless because it would not be using things we can actually relate to and it would become a book placed in the Fiction category.   

 

ENDURING MEMORY

I expect to remember the entire novel for as long as I live. Mainly, I will carry out the many quotes and references in the story pertaining to life and human beings in general. On page 201, the protagonist makes a statement about the past, which I can connect to something we have studied in this class. Does the past really matter? In terms of learning from our mistakes yes yet he claims, “Mother Culture says that this is as it should be. There’s nothing in the past for us. The past is dreck. The past is something to be put behind us, something to be escaped from.” This is one point of view which makes sense and just reminds us that it IS behind us and we cannot simply expect to continue to live in it. Many are far too obsessed or personally traumatized by their own pasts that they cannot seem to continue forward, and it is sad because they do not acknowledge the fact that they are wasting their time trying to change something that already happened and can never be changed. This quote serves as a reminder to move forward and leave the damaging things in the past where they belong. Another famous quote makes a reference to the way of how peoples live, meaning to the cultures of the world. “…but I’ve read enough of it to know that the Zuni don’t think their way is the way for everyone, and that the Navajo don’t think their way is the way for everyone. Each of them has a way that works well for them. And that way that works well for them is what they teach their children.” This is important when it comes to understanding world cultures and beliefs within our own cultures. It is important to understand how things get passed down in a community from generation to generation in order to avoid our key defect-ignorance. The third, which I feel is one of the most important talks about the type of world we are living in unconsciously. “I’m afraid it’s a cause to which almost none of humanity will subscribe. White or colored, male or female, what the people of this culture want is to have as much wealth and power in the Taker prison as they can get. They don't give a damn that it’s destroying the world.” Again, it illustrates our selfishness in the world and how we are not really aware of what we are doing or why. We do things simply because we imitate our ancestors, we think this is the correct way to live when in reality it is killing millions and we need to change our minds because ultimately, we can’t change the world if we can’t change ourselves.       

No comments:

Post a Comment